Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Reflection Post


   What was your biggest struggle during this project?

                                     I think that our biggest struggle as a group was our challenges meeting together. Dude to family circumstances, health problems, and a variety of other hurdles I think we did a really good job working together separately whether that was actually on our own or working in pairs with another group member to accomplish a task.

   What aspect of the documentary makes you most proud?

                  As one of the person that set up and filmed almost all of the interviews, I was proud of the quality of testimonies we received.

                  Truthfully I am surprised by the number of views we have gotten on our video in such a short amount of time. I initially thought that we would struggle to get to 1000 views but was pleasantly surprised by the number of people (2000+) that took the time to watch our video. I think that speaks a lot to the importance of CSF and makes me proud that our group got the chance to explore it and share it with our community.

   What aspect of the documentary would you have changed?

         I would have taken out the portion on the funding of CSF. The video would have been more powerful had it just been the testimonies and why it is an important part of campus so that it would have been more like the documentaries we watched in class before we began the project. I would have also worked to make it more visually interesting instead of a few people talking for long periods of time, although for the film we made it was effective. I

   If you had 6 months to work on this project, what more could/would you have done?

                  I would have found more interviews of people who weren’t in CSF but were still affected by it as well as talked to more people who haven’t been to a CSF event before about their general opinion on it is and what they think it means to the campus without ever having been apart of it.

   What aspects of the project were you personally responsible for? Please be specific as possible.

          I was responsible for setting up/filming/and asking most of the interview questions that were present in the documentary. However, most of the interviews I procured didn’t make it into the documentary because many of the testimonies were very similar

   We can all agree that group is frustrating. What did you do to try to promote a healthy group atmosphere? What more do you wish you had done to help the group?  Do you feel like you contributed a fair amount to the overall project?

         Although I wasn’t always able to be present in class, I consistently asked my group members in what ways I could help them so that they knew I was willing and able to work on the project whenever and in whatever way was possible. Considering I ended up doing a number of things I didn’t originally intend on doing, I think I contributed a fair amount to the project as a whole. I wish I had been able to help Kendall more however with the editing because I know it’s a big job and she did a really great job.

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Scene Depiction: CSF


     After putting a lot of thought into which club meeting to attend, I decided to focus on the Christian Student Fellowship club, better known as CSF. I chose CSF because it is almost a surreal presence on campus and seems “cult like” to many who aren’t participants. Although it is a Christian organization, it seems to have an omnipresent feeling not only because they are worshiping an all knowing God, but also because they have activities going on all over campus where everyone is invited. Believers, nonbelievers, everyone. They are known for having some of the most exciting activities on campus including a World Record holding water balloon fight, and several enormous parties throughout the year. I wanted to explore their club and attend a few of their meetings because I was curious to see how different they were internally at their than the way they presented themselves externally at the larger events.

(Via: CSF Facebook page


            On Tuesday night I attended SHIFT, a CSF meeting specifically for freshman. I chose to go to this meeting instead of one of their other meetings because not only am I a freshman and I can relate to the others but because this must be the source of CSF power. They seem to really reach out specifically to freshman to let them know that there is a world outside of the 'party school' lifestyle (parties, drinking, drugs, sex). I think that the SHIFT program is how CSF really keeps and furthers their presence on campus because they get the freshman to come to their big fun events and then convince them to come to a SHIFT meeting and are able to form a community.


            When I walked into the CSF building on Woodland on Tuesday I immediately felt welcomed. I walked into small entrance where three hipster youth in their beanies, flannel shirts, skinny jeans, and wallabies were standing to engage me with a random “get to know you question” and a nametag. I ended up talking to a staff member/leader named Blake who went on to talk to me most of my time at CSF. The Lexington native and I talked about things such as concerts we had been to and bands we liked. We ended up making a connection when he told me he had seen Mumford & Sons at a venue that is very near to my home in Knoxville. Through our Knoxville connection we started talking about one of the other leaders in CSF who is from Knoxville and a mutual friend, I told Blake that ‘Tater’ Cunningham was how I originally found out about CSF. Blake asked me if I had been to SHIFT before and I told him that I told him that the last time I walked away with an unclear understanding of the goal of CSF and of SHIFT so he explained, “[the goal of] SHIFT is to provide a place to ‘hangout’ [with other people seeking similar things].” I continued to talk to Blake extensively and he walked me through their other programs such as Synergy and their Bible Studies.


            While we talked, we slowly filtered into a line of other SHIFT attendees that consisted of other freshman as well as upperclassmen leaders including our mutual friend Tater easily distinguishable by his loud and outgoing personality. This line took us from a mostly empty room upstairs with only a sofa and bar where soda was being served, down the stairs, and into a room filled with mismatched sofas that looked to have been picked up from local thrift/vintage stores, a large projection screen (where the meeting could be viewed if there was over flow from the main room upstairs). Downstairs there was a buffet line of Mexican food that had been provided by a local church. After we got our food, we headed back upstairs and took a seat in the largest room in the building that was filled with students, leaders, tables, chairs, a stage, and all the accompanying accouterments.

(Via: CSF website


            After eating for a few minutes in spotty silence with Blake and an awkward icebreaker about parties we had been to, a blonde college student took the stage and told the croup about upcoming events taking place with in CSF both long term and short term including information about spring break trips run by CSF. Once she had finished, the late 20 something speaker, also in his flannel shirt and skinny jeans, took the stage where he spent about forty minutes talking on the first night of a series called “College Myths.” His specific topic of the night was on college parties and that he felt that God wanted us to parties. Somehow he went from that straight into talking about the Trinity (I’m still not clear what transition lead us from the Final Four riots last year to that point) and had several member of SHIFT stand and talk about what they understood of God, the Holy Spirit and Jesus.


            Once the speaker finished praying for the group, a different blonde college student to the stage and restated the announcements from the beginning of the service.  After the meeting many members stayed after to talk and mingle with one another, really giving the sense of community that CSF does a really good job of portraying to the rest of campus. I stayed after to talk to Tater more about CSF. I wanted to talk to him about it specifically because he truly loves CSF and really believes in its power. I asked him the same question I asked Blake, and he told me that CSF’s goal was to “love unconditionally… to love the students of the University of Kentucky into the Kingdom of God… [although we do] serve others in the community, our main group that we focus on is college students.” I also asked Tater if he thinks that the community within CSF at events like Synergy and small groups differ between the events like the water balloon fight and their parties, he responded “We bring in people from all walks of life, social classes, styles, majors, etc. For our water balloon fight we bring in anyone and everyone; parties anyone and everyone is welcome; events like synergy any one is welcome; and small groups again anyone is welcome. For pancakes every Friday night we consistently are serving both Christians and non-Christians. We have Jocks, Nerds, Hipsters, Rock, Black, White, Oriental, Arabic, and many other types of people come through our doors and they are always shown love.” Because Tater is so involved in CSF I was also curious about what got him originally involved and what made him decide that he wanted to take on a bigger role and become a leader as well. “I got involved at CSF because I found it to be a home. The campus ministries have a good way of making sure you get plugged in at the campus ministry that brings you closest to God. CSF happened to the one that fit that. All I ever see at CSF is love for this campus. That is what got me involved. Sure CSF does a lot of cool events but the fact that it is not for popularity but to further the Kingdom of God on this campus is what made me fall in love with it. I became a leader because I wanted to grow closer to God in a core group (small group bible study for the leaders), and to serve as I had been served and love as I had been loved. God loves me and he has such an abundant love that it overflows from me so instead of wasting that love. Why not show it to those who don't realize how much God loves them.” After my lengthy talk with Tater I left with a sense of how much true community CSF really is, not just a gathering of people, but an ever growing family and not as ‘cult like’ as other on campus may view them. 
(Pictured: 'Tater' Cunningham 
Via: Facebook

Monday, February 18, 2013

Peer Review Thoughts


   What do you think the goal of peer review is or should be?
        
I think that the goal of peer review is to be able to constructively criticize each other’s work.

   Do you think peer review is helpful? Why or why not?

         I don’t think that peer review is helpful. Although I think that it can be used as a useful tool, I think most of the time it is not taken seriously or utilized to it’s full potential.

   As a writer, what do you want to know about your work? What kinds of feedback do you find most helpful?

                     As a writer I want to know if I’m on the right track. I want to know that I am doing the assignment correctly and in an interesting manner that is enjoyable for my audience.
       
   As a reviewer, what do you need (from both myself and the author) to provide the best feedback possible?
                    
                     As a reviewer I need the time to read through the paper a few times so I can review it to the best of my ability and to be able to talk to the author about the questions I have and explain to them the comments I make on their paper.
       
   What group sizes do you prefer (2 people, 5 people, etc.)?

                  I think that pairs work the best for peer review because as much time can be spent on a paper is needed and it’s not like a competition to see how many we can get through.


   How long do you prefer to work on peer review projects?
                    
                     One of the things I really like, is having the entire class time to be able to work on peer review projects. It gives enough time to
       
   Would you like to pick your own groups or have me select the pairings?

         I like picking my own group because I want a reviewer I know. I don’t want to have to be worried about judgment from a peer I don’t know. Although I understand that everyone has access to my work, I don’t want to embarrass myself if my work is totally off point and I would rather have someone that knows me (of my choice) review my work-in-progress because I think it is far less stressful.

Peer Review Thoughts


   What do you think the goal of peer review is or should be?
        
I think that the goal of peer review is to be able to constructively criticize each other’s work.

   Do you think peer review is helpful? Why or why not?

         I don’t think that peer review is helpful. Although I think that it can be used as a useful tool, I think most of the time it is not taken seriously or utilized to it’s full potential.

   As a writer, what do you want to know about your work? What kinds of feedback do you find most helpful?

                     As a writer I want to know if I’m on the right track. I want to know that I am doing the assignment correctly and in an interesting manner that is enjoyable for my audience.
       
   As a reviewer, what do you need (from both myself and the author) to provide the best feedback possible?
                    
                     As a reviewer I need the time to read through the paper a few times so I can review it to the best of my ability and to be able to talk to the author about the questions I have and explain to them the comments I make on their paper.
       
   What group sizes do you prefer (2 people, 5 people, etc.)?

                  I think that pairs work the best for peer review because as much time can be spent on a paper is needed and it’s not like a competition to see how many we can get through.


   How long do you prefer to work on peer review projects?
                    
                     One of the things I really like, is having the entire class time to be able to work on peer review projects. It gives enough time to
       
   Would you like to pick your own groups or have me select the pairings?

         I like picking my own group because I want a reviewer I know. I don’t want to have to be worried about judgment from a peer I don’t know. Although I understand that everyone has access to my work, I don’t want to embarrass myself if my work is totally off point and I would rather have someone that knows me (of my choice) review my work-in-progress because I think it is far less stressful.